GOP @)!@ ...(2012)

2012 that is.
Mitch Daniels, was my earliest hunch, Huntsman was a close second. Ron Paul was an early hope, but Gary Johnson beat him to the announcement. Now when I say hope, this is from the perspective that there be a good candidate for Republicans and the 2012 race, not that they should have any shot at being good for the country. This does not take into considerations any impact of a third party or independent candidate, or any political calculus. I don't find any references in a search of my blog but could have embedded some comment or link that may mention them. I associate Daniels with a Chris Matthews* comment, and Huntsman with some China controversy, while Paul and Johnson are libertarian. Which may be why I have been focused on economics and Ayn Rand. I would like to have a good de bait on neo-classical economics. It is hard to imagine Mitt Romney making it but then the longer the so-called libertarian or tea party candidate split the vote he or these guys could run the fish ladder, and it is hard to imagine a third party candidate that would not be just another spoiler. I don't want to do the political calculus to rock that boat.

* one reason I might scratch Daniels, but then again

5-17-11 Related links: Needless to say** Label
(Republicans 2012)
One No Trump
Two No Huckabee***

**Calm Pend E Um has a reference to an anomoly
*** Raising Cain

March Madness

Normally this refers to Basketball,

which involves a tournament.

There are reasons Sarah Palin is not in the running.

She is only in the change game.

And that is a shame.

Simply put: Put up or shut up!

Get in the Republican race and you can have your debate.

Short of that, someone should accept her challenge.

And I don't mean Hillary or Katie*.

Meanwhile, Sarah Palin might do well to find out what a debate entails.

Even Comedy Central or MSNBC, should not be considered as early round qualifiers for the Final Four.**

* The Colbert Report or No Labels is not the shame, but Olympia Snow did come up. Being an enemy does not make you a candidate or a debater, let alone a journalist.

**Who would compete in this evolution?[i.e. Who would stoop to taking Sarah Palin serious let alone qualified to debate. Not that that would qualify her to advance to a final debate round. There was so much C-rap here, I thought I would d'ribble the punch line. Wouldn't we love Palin to actually debate*** someone of her watch-ama gotcha?]

[But speaking of tournaments, I don't think the Raw Money Class wants to be facing Obama anytime too soon.]

*** Buddy Roemer has left the building. Not to mention Gary Johnson.(C-Hillary Link*/see "actually debate" links.)

[3-21-12 Robert Reich ponders run.]

Happy Earth Day!

It's not too late.

A Faith-Based Wake-Up Call on Earth Day
by Bishop Robinson for Center for American Progress

Speaking of E. D.
[Environmental Disinformation, and Reptile Disfunction]

[Speaking of leaps... searching... this is it... from here. I have a project in the works* regarding Atlas Shrugged author Ayn Rand, but just as I finished the previous post, former Governor Gary Johnson N.M. enters the 2012 race.(Not to mention quixotic mixes.)]
[More Dylan Ratigan: Pre-Town Hall, The Koch Party, Gulf Disaster, Debt Ceiling, Bright Bart, De Deficit.]
[De Calf Party]

* A Novelist Idea: here is a post draft trailer or tease.(apparently not that novelist)

Congress of Charlatan Conniving?

CJ P. interviews Noam Chomski on the Obama Legacy.

I might call it the problematics of democracy.
But Not Fully Read Yet.
Early questions relate* to suggested Elizabeth Warren / Gary Johnson debate.
I will be looking for positive alternatives from this analysis, especially in foreign policy and diplomacy.  The opposition must be accounted for, as well as the differences in neo-pragmatism.**
Something about working it here before working it over there?  Or the inverse of the pre-Bush(43)con on policeman and nation builders. 

*(The Warren Wing vis a vis the Libertarian Wing of the parties.)
** a fleeting label[!]